Safety reporting proposals
![]() |
Alastair Soane, Director at Structural-Safety and ICE Fellow, explains why ICE members need to respond to a consultation that will create safer buildings. |
In June 2019, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) published a consultation, seeking views on government proposals for a radically new building safety system which puts the safety of residents at its heart. This includes new safety reporting proposals for both fire and structural safety issues.
We're calling on ICE members and other industry professionals to lend their support and respond to the consultation, helping us to assure society that infrastructure professionals can be trusted.
The tragedy of the Grenfell Tower fire on 14 June 2017, which claimed the lives of 72 people, rocked confidence in the building safety system in the UK.
The Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety, led by Dame Judith Hackitt, produced a set of recommendations to provide a robust regulatory system for the future. One of the key recommendations is to build on the existing Confidential Reporting on Structural Safety (CROSS), a unique reporting scheme run by Structural Safety UK and sponsored by ICE, the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE) and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Its purpose is to share lessons learned from structural safety issues and help prevent future failures by providing insight into how safety issues occur and spurring the development of safety improvement measures.
Currently, the scheme collects voluntary reports on structural safety issues and freely shares the learning from these reports with industry on a no-blame basis. CROSS depends on professionals like you to submit those reports. Any lesson you have ever learned from a CROSS publication was only possible because someone like you decided to submit a report, allowing you to learn from their experience.
The government’s proposals would expand and strengthen the existing CROSS scheme to collect more voluntary reports on structural safety and establish a scheme for collecting reports on fire safety issues. There would also be a new mandatory system for key dutyholders to report occurrences of fire and structural safety issues to the building safety regulator.
Structural Safety fully supports the government’s safety reporting proposals and its view that the best systems of oversight and regulation ensure that the people operating within them learn from their experiences, without fear of blame or retribution.
We believe that the expanded and strengthened CROSS scheme, along with the new mandatory reporting scheme, will complement each other to develop a safety-focused culture in the sector and share intelligence to better understand safety risks and monitor safety trends. Effective safety reporting will be crucial to developing trust in the new building safety regulatory system and will lead to safer buildings.
This is why we're asking for your help. If the proposals receive adequate support, MHCLG may be able to provide early approval for the funding needed to expand CROSS.
Structural Safety has produced detailed guidance to help supporters to respond to three consultation questions in particular, with instructions on how to make a submission. This should take no longer than 15 minutes.
The deadline for responding is 31 July, but we'd encourage as many of you to respond as early as possible so that we can take these proposals forward without further delay. With your support, we can improve the industry’s safety record and ensure public confidence in our sector.
You can respond to the consultation here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/building-a-safer-future-proposals-for-reform-of-the-building-safety-regulatory-system
This articles was originally published on 18 July 2019 on the ICE Civil Engineering Blog.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Analysis: Is Hackitt a turning point for the profession?
- Building a safer future: an implementation plan.
- Building a safer future: proposals for reform of the building safety regulatory system.
- Grenfell Tower articles.
- Grenfell Tower Fire.
- Hackitt review of the building regulations and fire safety, final report.
- ICE Grenfell Tower review.
Featured articles and news
Retrofit 25 – What's Stopping Us?
Exhibition Opens at The Building Centre.
Types of work to existing buildings
A simple circular economy wiki breakdown with further links.
A threat to the creativity that makes London special.
How can digital twins boost profitability within construction?
The smart construction dashboard, as-built data and site changes forming an accurate digital twin.
Unlocking surplus public defence land and more to speed up the delivery of housing.
The Planning and Infrastructure Bill
An outline of the bill with a mix of reactions on potential impacts from IHBC, CIEEM, CIC, ACE and EIC.
Farnborough College Unveils its Half-house for Sustainable Construction Training.
Spring Statement 2025 with reactions from industry
Confirming previously announced funding, and welfare changes amid adjusted growth forecast.
Scottish Government responds to Grenfell report
As fund for unsafe cladding assessments is launched.
CLC and BSR process map for HRB approvals
One of the initial outputs of their weekly BSR meetings.
Architects Academy at an insulation manufacturing facility
Programme of technical engagement for aspiring designers.
Building Safety Levy technical consultation response
Details of the planned levy now due in 2026.
Great British Energy install solar on school and NHS sites
200 schools and 200 NHS sites to get solar systems, as first project of the newly formed government initiative.
600 million for 60,000 more skilled construction workers
Announced by Treasury ahead of the Spring Statement.
The restoration of the novelist’s birthplace in Eastwood.
Life Critical Fire Safety External Wall System LCFS EWS
Breaking down what is meant by this now often used term.
PAC report on the Remediation of Dangerous Cladding
Recommendations on workforce, transparency, support, insurance, funding, fraud and mismanagement.
New towns, expanded settlements and housing delivery
Modular inquiry asks if new towns and expanded settlements are an effective means of delivering housing.